Sunday, 31 May 2015

ASH WEDNESAY: A CALL TO TRUE CHANGE




ASH WEDNESAY: A CALL TO TRUE CHANGE

Fr. Prof. Cornelius Afebu Omonokhua

According to John Cardinal Henry Newman, “To live is to change and to have changed often is to be perfect.” This belief is accepted by many people. Another common slogan today is: “Be the change you want to see in others.” The clamour for change is not new. People are generally bored with permanence and duration. Before Socrates, “change” was one of the themes of debate for ancient philosophers. Heraclitus was the first known philosopher to have directly raised the issue of change. According to him, "one cannot step into the same river twice". "The road up and the road down are one and the same". On the contrary, the Eleatic school of thought founded by Parmenides affirmed that change was impossible and that reality was one. The followers of Parmenides especially, Melissus and Zeno provided more arguments to prove the impossibility of motion that involves an infinite number of steps. Aristotle introduced the notion of potency and act to distinguish being-in-act from being-in-potency. He discovered the concept of potency by observing accidental changes. He observed, for instance, that a sculptor can make a statue from a block of marble.  The figure of the statue is in potency in the block of marble. For Aristotle, motion is the technical name for change in accident. He identified three kinds of motion: a change in quality (alteration), a change in quantity, size (growth or diminution), and a change in place (local motion).   Aquinas proposed that for every true motion, there must be a cause sustaining that motion. With this position he identified the first way of proving the existence of God.[1]
The above arguments present the fact that for everything that exists, there is an author. That whatever exists is in motion and therefore subject to temporary permanence. In this context, every change is bound to have content. In the motion of change, the question is “what is the status of the present reality?” “From what to what is the reality changing?” Another question could be; “Which is easier, to change oneself or to change another person.” The reality in life is that many people do not think that they need change, they often think that it is the other person that is going the wrong way.” The truth is that the greatest warrior in the world is a person who can conquer himself or herself by taking charge and control over his or her temperaments. This is where the concept of change is central in human existence.

Creation was put in place to set in motion the principle of dynamism and progress. God exists of himself; hence only God is constant and does not need change. Whoever thinks that he can change the world without changing himself is claiming equality with God. It is only God who exists by nature. Every other creature derives existence from God who chose to create the world and all that exists. The world exists because of God’s free choice that the world should be (Genesis 1: 1-25). In Adam, the human race is chosen and sent on a mission to change in the context of service to “be fruitful, multiply, fill the earth and conquer it. Humanity was chosen to be master of the fish of the sea, the birds of heaven and all living creatures on the earth” (Genesis 1: 28- 29). Jesus Christ would tell us later that, “Any tree that does not produce good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire” (Matthew 7: 19). But in Adam, humanity failed in the call to be fruitful. The eating of the forbidden fruit (Genesis 3) is akin to producing sour fruits (Isaiah 5: 1-4).

Today we live in a world where some people present themselves simply as the best and agents of change. Some people have developed a complex of not seeing anything good in the present, they only think that, “the bird in the bush is better than the bird at hand”, contrary to the normal adage that, “a bird at hand is worth more than a thousand in the bush”. Because the human person is selfish, the world has been turned to a rolling stone that gathers no mud. To encourage self transformation, the Church celebrates Ash Wednesday to recall humanity to authentic existence. The wearing of ashes is a response to the call to repent and believe in the Gospel (Mark 1:15). Those who wear ashes are reminded that from dust, they were created and to dust they would return (Genesis 3:19).

PRESIDENT, PASTOR AND GOVERNANCE




 PRESIDENT, PASTOR AND GOVERNANCE
Cornelius Afebu Omonokhua

I have wondered and pondered why the new President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria had pastors as running mates in the two past presidential elections. One could think that it was either because he loves pastors or because it was the option of his political parties. In 2011, Muhammadu Buhari had Pastor Tunde Bakare as running mate under the Congress for Progressive Change (CPC). One would have expected that our new President would drop the idea of “a pastor running mate” when on February 2, 2014, NigerianEye and some other media reported that Tunde Bakare during a sermon allegedly likens APC to the Church of Satan. This did not happen. In 2015, Buhari again had another pastor, Prof Yemi Osibanjo as running mate in the All Progressive Congress (APC). This time, they won the election and took over governance on May 29, 2015.  While I congratulate the new President of Nigeria to the governance and leadership of the nation, may I welcome him with a silent hidden puzzle: “Mr President Sir, why do you love to work with a Pastor as your vice whereas you are a committed and dedicated Muslim?”

Monday, 1 September 2014

CHRONOLOGY OF VIOLENCE AND TERRORISM IN NIGERIA





CHRONOLOGY OF VIOLENCE
 AND TERRORISM IN NIGERIA  

Fr. Cornelius Afebu Omonokhua

2002
2002:                           Many people claim that Boko Haram was formally founded   
2007
2007:                          Buju Foi, an influential Boko Haram member, was appointed by Borno State Governor, Ali Modu Sheriff, as commissioner of religious affairs.
2009
July 2009:                  Boko Haram attacked Maiduguri police stations.  Mohammed Yusuf released a video and threatened vengeance.

Saturday, 2 August 2014

ECHOES FROM “RELIGIONS FOR PEACE”




ECHOES FROM “RELIGIONS FOR PEACE”

Cornelius Afebu Omonokhua


Religions for Peace had the 9th World Assembly in Vienna, Austria on November 20-22, 2013. This world’s largest multi-religious organization brought together religious leaders from the Baha’i, Buddhist, Christian, Hindu, Indigenous, Jain, Jewish, Muslim, Sikh, Shinto, Taoist and Zoroastrian religions. More than six hundred religious leaders represented all historic faith traditions and every region of the world in the 2013 Assembly in Vienna. I was privileged to be a delegate from Nigeria in this World Assembly along with His Eminence, John Cardinal Onaiyekan, His Eminence, Sultan Muhammad Sa’ad Abubakar III, Sr. Maria Ifechukwu Udorah (DDL), Sr. Agatha Chikelo (DMMM), Elder Sunday Oibe, Muhammad Kassim and Femi Abbas. I am sincerely grateful to His Eminence, John Cardinal Onaiyekan and His Eminence, Sultan Muhammad Sa’ad Abubakar III for making it possible for the Nigerian Christian and Muslim communities to be represented in this Assembly. 

MAY THE BOMB BOW TO FOOTBALL FOREVER




MAY THE BOMB BOW TO FOOTBALL FOREVER

Cornelius Afebu Omonokhua

Join me dear compatriots to eulogise the Nigerian youths, our pride and hope for a better tomorrow. Let every Nigerian wear each player of the FIFA UNDER 17 a golden crown. These boys have told the whole world that Nigeria is not all bad news as it is being portrayed in the foreign media. How can Nigerians ever forget the Friday of November 9, 2013 when even the bombs remained silent and forgot to blast in the terrorists’ empires of our dear native land, Nigeria! Perhaps the suicide bombers were in a rhapsody of the thoughts of what youths should be used for. The value of a responsible youth lies in the honour and glory that he offers to the parents instead of shame and disgrace for whatever reason. Let us raise our cups in honour of these most fantastic youths of the century for making Nigerians proud even as our respectable senators refused to say “nay” to the extension of the state of emergency in the terrorist territories.  Congratulation Nigeria! Congratulation Golden Eaglets! May your football continue to blast in the place of the bombs!

DIALOGUE OF ETHNIC NATIONALITIES




DIALOGUE OF ETHNIC NATIONALITIES 

Cornelius Afebu Omonokhua

The Federal Government of Nigeria has given us a serious job. Since the announcement of the National Dialogue, many Nigerians have started to think of what should and should not be. Those who are positive about the national dialogue have started suggesting guidelines and proposals to the National Committee before the actual “table conference”. Those who are suspicious and negative about the national dialogue are proffering reasons why it should not take place and the attendant implications and possible dangers of the project. From all the points of view so far, whether we support or disagree, the truth is that the dialogue has started. The forms and principles of dialogue do not reduce dialogue to a conference hall and table. That we have started talking in the electronic media and writing in the print media is an indication that the National Conference has indeed taken off. These responses to the Federal Government announcement of “national dialogue” fall within the forms of dialogue of life, action, experience, social engagement and intellectual exchange. What will happen in the conference may be a rejection or confirmation of the feelings of the people. In other words the conversation in the conference hall and the conference table would be a “formal ritual” because the real conversation has started. Among suggestions and recommendations so far made towards the formal National Dialogue, I found the “Proposed Suggestions for the National Conference” of Chinweizu very exciting.

UNITY IN THE HUMAN PSYCHE




UNITY IN THE HUMAN PSYCHE

Cornelius Afebu Omonokhua

What can bring about unity in our human psyche to make us see ourselves as one? I would like to examine the mind of our political ancestors when they were fighting for the independence of Nigeria. It will be good to know how they perceived the way and manner the colonial masters were governing the amalgamated ethnic regions. Were our political ancestors really matured and prepared to take over governance from the British? What was their vision of an independent Nigeria? What were their expectations? What was the relationship between Nnamdi Azikiwe, Obafemi Awolowo, Ahmadu Bello and the other nationalists from the different regions? Was their idea of a united Nigeria realistic or idealistic? Did they have a critical study of how the ethnic groups had administered their regions traditionally as empires, kingdoms and emirates before the amalgamation of 1914?