OIC AND PEACE BUILDING IN NIGERIA?
Cornelius Afebu Omonokhua
When a child is critically ill, the parent accepts suggestions of any person and places that could provide healing. In sickness, everybody around you becomes “a medical doctor”. Nigeria is plagued with a terminal disease of terrorism that appears to defy military strategy. President Muhammadu Buhari has visited America and some West Africa countries to source for healing to the nation’s malady. On August 20, 2015, John Cardinal Onaiyekan invited me to a meeting with King Abdullah Bin Abdulaziz International Centre for Interreligious and Intercultural Dialogue (KAICIID). The main agenda of the meeting was the plan to organize a conference in Nigeria that could assist in promoting interreligious and intercultural relations. Bishop Matthew Hassan Kukah is the Vatican delegate to KAICIID, a Nongovernmental and worldwide organization that was founded in October 2011 by King Abdullah of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Although the Headquarter is in Vienna, Austria, the Republic of Austria and the Kingdom of Spain supports the Centre with the aim of keeping KAICIID free from all political interference and influence. KAICIID facilitates intercultural and interreligious dialogue as a humanely strategic forum for cooperation, communication, partnership and information exchange thereby building understanding and mutual benefit among peoples of the world. On October 13, 2011 an agreement for the establishment of KAICIID in Vienna was signed by the governments of Austria, Spain and Saudi Arabia. To know more about this centre, you may visit: (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KAICIID_Dialogue_Centre).
KAICIID works in close collaboration with Religions for Peace, the largest international coalition of representatives from the world’s religions dedicated to promoting peace that was founded in 1970. His Eminence, John Cardinal Onaiyekan (the Catholic Archbishop of Abuja) and His Eminence, Alhaji Mahammadu Sa'ad Abubakar III (the Sultan of Sokoto and President-General of the Nigerian Supreme Council for Islamic Affairs) are among the Co-Chairmen in the world and Africa. The International Secretariat headquarter of Religions for Peace is in New York City, with Regional Conferences in Europe, Asia, Middle East, Africa and the Americas with more than 90 affiliates at the national level, and a number of local units. Religions for Peace enjoy consultative status with the United Nations Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC), with UNESCO and with UNICEF. Dr. William F Vendley is its Secretary General. I have already published the report of the Religions for peace of the last meeting in which I participated in Vienna, Austria. This non-governmental organization (NGO) serves on all continents representing 90 countries; it networks with World Council of senior religious leaders while respecting religious differences, common humanity and the influence of peace within every religion. This organization has created inter-religious partnerships to confront most dire issues such as stopping war, ending poverty and protecting the earth. Religions for Peace was founded in 1970 and supported by various foundations, governments, intergovernmental organizations, religious communities, religiously affiliated development agencies and individuals. You could learn more about this organization. by visiting (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religions_for_Peace)
That Nigeria participates in the activities of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) is no longer news. Ambassador Yahaya Lawal was present at the meeting with KAICIID in Abuja. Ambassador Yahaya, from Katsina works in the General Secretariat of OIC. He is also the Nigeria Ambassador to Jeddah. In that meeting, he revealed the intention of the OIC to intervene in the security challenges of Nigeria. In our conversation, he believes that Nigeria can benefit a lot from the Organization of Islamic Cooperation. He explained that OIC has nothing to do with missionary work. The Islamic Cooperation does not convert people to Islam but contributes to the betterment of Nigerians to make Nigeria a better place.
According to him, they had met with President Goodluck Ebele Jonathan, the immediate past president of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, to discuss the restoration of peace that was destroyed by the insurgents. He affirmed that the OIC does not support any form of terrorism given that terrorism contradicts Islam. The OIC intends to initiate projects that could bring about peace to Nigeria by partnering with the Institute of peace and conflict resolution and the Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN). The organization hopes to collaborate with the Nigeria Inter-religious Executive Council (NIREC) and other Nongovernmental Peace and Dialogue initiatives to restore peace to Nigeria.
Given the past controversies about the status of Nigeria in OIC, it was recommended that if OIC really has what it takes to restore peace to Nigeria, the organization should begin with intra-Muslim dialogue by concentrating mainly on the counter narratives of the terrorists’ ideology. This suggestion is relevant because, it appears that many Nigerians including some Muslims have a single story of OIC as an organization whose only intention is to Islamize the world. On February 4, 2015 Niyi posted this: “Osinbajo Slams Jonathan for Attending OIC Meeting, Defends Buhari on Alleged Plans to Islamize Nigeria”. Here is the brief of the post. “Vice Presidential candidate of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Professor Yemi Osinbajo, has berated President Goodluck Jonathan for being the first Nigerian leader to have attended the meeting of the Organisation of Islamic Countries (OIC) since Nigeria was clandestinely enlisted by President Ibrahim Babangida in 1986.” Niyi added that Nigeria is one of the 57 member states of the OIC, an organisation that states that it is "the collective voice of the Muslim world" and works to safeguard and protect the interests of the Muslim world in the spirit of promoting international peace and harmony. According to Osinbajo, those accusing the presidential candidate of the APC, Muhammadu Buhari, of being a Muslim fundamentalist, who might Islamize Nigeria are getting it all wrong. Throughout his period as military head of state, Buhari was under intense pressure to drag Nigeria into the OIC, but he never yielded, because he respects Nigeria as a secular state, in line with the constitution. Besides, his cook and driver are Christians.”
That OIC was used to score a political point during the campaigns shows to what extent the organization is a bitter pill in the mouth of many Nigerians. Ishaq Oloyode, the secretary general of NIREC and the Nigerian Supreme Council for Islamic Affairs (NSCIA) had said that “he was not yet aware that the country has signed the OIC charter. But it is alleged that the first meeting of the organization was held in Morocco in 1969. General Yakubu Gowon, sent a delegation of observers, led by Abubakar Gumi, to represent only the Nigerian Muslim community. When a French news agency reported that Nigeria has been admitted into the organization as its 46th member in January 1986, many argued that as a secular nation, it had no business with the Islamic body. While the Muslim community saw it as a pleasant surprise, the Christian community strongly resented the idea as `Islamization of Nigeria' and requested the president to deregister the country from the organization, since our constitution holds that Nigeria is a secular society (http://nigeriavillagesquare.com). These arguments could sustain the reasons why the OIC should facilitate sincere dialogue within the Muslim community to convince Nigerians about the true identity of the organization, the true status of Nigeria in the organization and what it would benefit Nigerians. If OIC can stop terrorism in Nigeria and the whole world, then everybody would cease to judge the organization with a single story. Until then, this question lingers: “Can OIC restore peace to Nigeria?"
Saturday, 5 September 2015
OIC AND PEACE BUILDING IN NIGERIA
Friday, 28 August 2015
TERRORISTS : MERCY AND AMNESTY?
TERRORISTS: MERCY AND AMNESTY?
Cornelius Afebu Omonokhua
When on April 2, 2013 some print media published: “Matthew Kukah Calls for Amnesty for Boko Haram in Easter Message”, many commentators went on literary riot as if the Bishop had made a mistake. The issue of dialogue and amnesty to Boko Haram is back again under the watch of President Muhammadu Buhari, a committed Muslim who understands the call of Islam to peace and reconciliation in any society. The Messenger of Allah (SAW) recommended that, “The Muslim who lives with people and endures the anguish that they cause is better than the Muslim who is not present with them and who avoids enduring the anguish” (Tirmizi, Kiyamah, 55/2507). This enquiry is an attempt to look again at the mode of operation to end the religious extremism of the terrorists.
We could also examine the possibility of combining the quest for dialogue and the actualization of the three months mandate given to the military to extinguish terrorism in Nigeria. It has been said over and over again that the gun alone cannot stop terrorism, hence the terms (Rahman and Raheem) that the terrorists are used to could also be employed in this conversation. Dr. Murat Kaya, in his book, The Final Divine Religion: Islam, Istanbul, Erkam Publications 2009, Page 33, says that “Rahman is interpreted as the All Merciful in the sense that Allah’s mercy encompasses all creation in the universe, while Raheem is interpreted as Allah’s mercy for the believers in the hereafter.”
Recently, the question of dialogue and amnesty to the terrorists has taken different headlines: On July 15, 2015, the Sun Newspaper reported: “Boko Haram puts Buhari in a tight spot.” Here is the opening statement:” The news that President Muhammadu Buhari would be willing to negotiate with Boko Haram as a way to end the relentless bombing campaigns by the terrorists has drawn mixed reactions from civil society. While some people believe the battle to end Boko Haram’s ongoing massacre of innocent citizens cannot be won without a negotiated settlement, others argue passionately that the right way to deal with Boko Haram’s brutal crusade is through relentless military force.” On July 9, 2015, Didi Adams reported on Omojuwa.com that “in a bid to put an end to the activities of Boko Haram insurgents in Nigeria, the Pentecos¬tal Fellowship of Nige¬ria (PFN) has thrown its weight behind the move by the Federal Government to dialogue with the insur¬gents if the need arises.”
Given that fighting corruption and terrorism is not achievable only with guns, I intend here to provoke a public conversation that could perhaps shed light on this question: Do terrorist deserve Rahman and Raheem in Islam? Put in a Christian context, do terrorists deserve the mercy and compassion of God? The Prophet of Islam (SAW) is reported to have said: “God Almighty shows mercy to those who show mercy” (Abu Dawud, Adah, 58/4941; Tirmizi, Bir 16/1924; Ahmad bin Hanbul, II, 160). Do terrorists invoke God’s mercy in their operations when they say: “Allahu Akbar” (God is the greatest) when slitting the throat of a human being and other methods to destroy lives and properties? Allah said to the Holy Prophet, “O Muhammad! We sent you not but as Mercy for all creatures (Qur’an 21:107). How do the terrorists interpret this verse? Do they hope to be merciful like the Holy Prophet one day? On 1st October, 1989, Sheikh Ahmed Deedat presented this lecture at the Royal Albert Hall in the United Kingdom: “How Rushdie Fooled the West.” In that lecture, Deedat said “that killing deliberately is punishable by death in Sharia”. When he was asked if Salman Rushdie could be forgiven for writing the “satanic verses”, he replied, “the Sharia does not forgive, only Allah can forgive” (YouTube.mp4).
God revealed Himself to Saint Maria Faustina Kowalska as “Divine Mercy”. In the hadith, the Prophet is reported to have said: “O Allah, guide these people, because they did not know what they were doing” (Al-Bukhari). Jesus said, "Father, forgive them, for they do not know what they are doing" (Luke 23:34). Could it be that the terrorists do not know what they are doing? What kind of dialogue do we need to bring them to the awareness of the evil they are inflicting on humanity and Allah’s creation? Many are of the opinion that the type of dialogue that could be initiated with the terrorist could be informal but who can accept that he or she knows a terrorist without the fear of being branded as one of them?
The popular opinion is that the Muslims whose religion is being impersonated and compromised by the terrorist groups could begin some form of intra-Muslim dialogue to see if they could identify anybody who can reach out to any of the terrorists. Another opinion is that the Islamic scholars must not relent in giving a counter narrative that could de-radicalize the terrorists. The Christians should condole with the many Muslim Scholars who have been slain in the process of doing this. The cooperation between the Christians and Muslims in some parts of Nigeria to cater for the internally displaced persons in the form of dialogue of life and social engagement could beam some light of encouragement to some Muslims who may be willing to take risk of reaching out to a terrorist.
The terrorist has become a mysterious ghost just as corruption has become an endemic cancer that has spread through the whole organs of the nation. While terrorism employs physical weapons to kill and displace people, corruption employs the pen, scam, facebook, twitters and all forms of social media to dupe people. Unfortunately, corruption has been reduced to monies looted from the national treasury, foreign reserve and transaction in crude oil. That the iron and steel industries in Nigeria are not allowed to function should be seen as corruption and neo-terrorism. That Nigeria cannot afford stable and uninterrupted electricity is a result of sabotage resulting from corruption that can be labelled “technical terrorism”. This overt and covert terrorism and corruption should be examined with a global spectrum in a bigger picture that should begin from the year of independence (1960) to show that “we all have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God” (Romans 3:23). Like the Psalmist, let us cry to God then: “If you Oh Lord should mark our guilt, Lord who would survive? But in you, there is mercy and fullness of redemption and for this, we revere you” (Psalm 130:3).
This again calls for a national examination of our collective conscience. To solve a problem, we need to identify its root. On August 15, 2015, Anthony Akinwale, a Dominican Professor of theology posted this message on facebook: “In view of our righteous indignation, and our determination to fight corruption in Nigeria, I move a motion that Nigeria arrest and prosecute in lawfully constituted courts all living past and present government officials who have looted or who have violated fundamental human rights, or have rigged or annulled elections, or have staged a military coup or benefitted from one. Does anyone second my motion?” This motion reminds me of Justice Oputa panel but it is left for you to say “yes” or “no” to this motion. This motion could further clarify and demystify the concept of corruption. Nigeria has gone through war against indiscipline. The war failed because of its militant concept. True change and conversion can only be realised if it is attended with love and a sincere desire that emanates from the heart with a perceivable goodwill and intention. Otherwise, those who perceive the war against corruption only as a mere vendetta could say: “let the person who has no sin be the first to cast a stone” (John 8:7).
