HELMET AND SHIELD FOR OUR KINGS
Cornelius Afebu Omonokhua
The report, “Unsung Heroes of Kano Emirate” on January 27, 2013 in the Sunday Trust reminds me of what Fr. Benjamin Dara CSSP told me in 1985 that “if you take care of your parishioners, your parishioners will take care of you.” The report revealed that “the palace guards of the Emir of Kano are resilient, loyal, trustworthy and lovely”. Two of the guards laid down their lives, shielding the monarch from a barrage of bullets that rained on the 83-year-old monarch’s car. Their heroic act has become a subject of eulogy among residents of Kano city. My discussion with the Catholic Bishop of Kano, Most Rev. Dr John Niyiring OSA reveals that the Emir of Kano truly loves his people and leads them with his wealth of experience. The Emir was attacked while coming from a religious duty to encourage the young students. If a leader loves his or her people and provides for them, the people in turn will do everything to give him or her protection.
The recommendation of a
constitutional protection for the royal fathers in my publication “where
is Africa’s royal reverence” on Sunday January 27, 2013 in Sunday Trust
and Pilot newspapers, have attracted some reactions. The first is that the
helmet and shield the royal fathers need go beyond constitutional protection.
Another person asked if the kings will not be robbed of their royal relevance
if they are actively involved in politics and given political roles in
governance. My recommendation however was the need to actively involve the
royal fathers in identifying and fishing out suspected criminals in their
various domains. This is by making them aware of cases within their area before
a suspect reaches the police net, through the traditional intelligence report.
This will charge them with the responsibility and accountability of their
office of taking care of the people. This however should not be seen as a
political appointment and a substitute for the duty of the Police.
It is a fact that “man knows man”
in every community. In my village for example, some people know the people that
are peaceful and the people that are troublesome. It follows that a traditional
ruler is in a position to know those who upset the shared existence in their
land. This is where the traditional rulers become very relevant. They can use
their traditional means like age groups and the masquerades to fish out
those who are thorns in the flesh of the communities. There is a saying in
Africa that “a child who says that the parents must not sleep also denies
himself of sleep.” Every Royal King should be skilled in security details
through conflict prevention, conflict management and conflict transformation,
first as their helmet and shield, second as their means to transform their
communities into a celestial bliss.
From the dialogue with the people
in “the public parliaments” and “traditional amphitheatre” it has been revealed
that the first protection of the king lies in his own personal helmet, shield
and breast plate. This means that the king must protect his personal integrity
by giving traditional relevance to the royal crown and the staff of the royal
office. If these symbols are carelessly desecrated, the king would not be
protected even by the ancestors.
History has revealed that in some
parts of the globe, some kings have died in the process of robbing their own
subjects. Some have been accused of enabling kidnappers while some have been
found to be directly involved in the acts. Some have also been accused of
ritual killings and corruption to make money. These are some of the ways some
kings have sold their royal crown, helmet, shield and their breast plate. The
crown is the symbol of authority, the shield protects the king from poisonous
arrows and the breast plates prevent the sword from piecing the heart of the
king. These symbols mean that the king needs the head and the heart to lead his
subjects.
The strength of a leader is found
in his intelligence (wisdom), courage, patience and prudence. A King worthy of
defence whose subjects can lay down their lives for is a king who has won
victory over his own temperaments. The rage of a king and any leader must not
be seen to be cheap. Spontaneous rage and easy burst of thunderous anger are
serious indicators that the king or leader has lost his inner peace and
security. This is also an indicator that the content of the character of the
leader needs reformation in the handling of the affairs of his people.
Braveness is deeper than external manifestation of anger because “what the cock uses to catch the hen is
hidden.” The king ought to be a man of few words and resilient in action.
Our people say that “the bird that knows
the worth of its feathers does not fly low.” Again, a loud noise reveals the emptiness of a heavy drum.
The global atomic age has shown
that people are no longer respected just because of their positions and titles.
In the past, a priest was respected just by seeing him in his cassock or in a
clerical collar. A king was respected just because he wore a royal crown and
sceptre. This age of enlightenment has shown that people now have to earn their
individual respect. It may therefore be deluding for any body to use the symbol
of his authority or title as a guarantee to force respect out of people. It is
rather easier to earn respect with love, discipline, dedication, responsibility
and commitment to one’s office and position. A person makes mockery of his or
her position by saying “I will show you my authority or don’t you know who I am
and what I can do to you with my authority?”
The perfume and aroma of authority spread freely and naturally from a
golden heart that reveals the noble content of character. Very often the power
you have over a person ends when he or she leaves your jurisdiction and you may
guess the implication of that action.
Alexander III who was the ancient
Greek king of Macedon around 323 BC was known as Alexander the Great not
because of the power he wielded over his subjects. He was not protected by his
helmet of bronze but by the fact that he was buried in the heart of his people
who held him in zenith esteem. This explains why he was able to raise an army
that made him the most successful military commander in history. He was never
defeated in battle. His “Linen Cuirass”
was traditional Greek body armour that was made of stiffened layers of linen
with steel scales around his waist as a symbol of chastity. His respect for
women kept him undefiled and fortified against any form of distraction through
lust. He was disciplined and focussed to gain the respect and obedience of his
subjects. His traditional “Gorgon head symbol” shows his wisdom and the content
of his royal character. [1] This
similar attitude is expected of the African king to win the favour of the
ancestors, the protection of Almighty God, and the support of the
subjects who will be eager to listen (obedience) whenever the royal
majesty gives a command.
Fr. Prof. Cornelius Afebu Omonokhua is the Director of Mission and
Dialogue of the Catholic Secretariat of Nigeria, Abuja; and Consultor of the
Commission for Religious Relations with Muslims (C.R.R.M), Vatican City
(comonokhua@hotmail.com).
No comments:
Post a Comment