Sunday, 31 May 2015

ASH WEDNESAY: A CALL TO TRUE CHANGE




ASH WEDNESAY: A CALL TO TRUE CHANGE

Fr. Prof. Cornelius Afebu Omonokhua

According to John Cardinal Henry Newman, “To live is to change and to have changed often is to be perfect.” This belief is accepted by many people. Another common slogan today is: “Be the change you want to see in others.” The clamour for change is not new. People are generally bored with permanence and duration. Before Socrates, “change” was one of the themes of debate for ancient philosophers. Heraclitus was the first known philosopher to have directly raised the issue of change. According to him, "one cannot step into the same river twice". "The road up and the road down are one and the same". On the contrary, the Eleatic school of thought founded by Parmenides affirmed that change was impossible and that reality was one. The followers of Parmenides especially, Melissus and Zeno provided more arguments to prove the impossibility of motion that involves an infinite number of steps. Aristotle introduced the notion of potency and act to distinguish being-in-act from being-in-potency. He discovered the concept of potency by observing accidental changes. He observed, for instance, that a sculptor can make a statue from a block of marble.  The figure of the statue is in potency in the block of marble. For Aristotle, motion is the technical name for change in accident. He identified three kinds of motion: a change in quality (alteration), a change in quantity, size (growth or diminution), and a change in place (local motion).   Aquinas proposed that for every true motion, there must be a cause sustaining that motion. With this position he identified the first way of proving the existence of God.[1]
The above arguments present the fact that for everything that exists, there is an author. That whatever exists is in motion and therefore subject to temporary permanence. In this context, every change is bound to have content. In the motion of change, the question is “what is the status of the present reality?” “From what to what is the reality changing?” Another question could be; “Which is easier, to change oneself or to change another person.” The reality in life is that many people do not think that they need change, they often think that it is the other person that is going the wrong way.” The truth is that the greatest warrior in the world is a person who can conquer himself or herself by taking charge and control over his or her temperaments. This is where the concept of change is central in human existence.

Creation was put in place to set in motion the principle of dynamism and progress. God exists of himself; hence only God is constant and does not need change. Whoever thinks that he can change the world without changing himself is claiming equality with God. It is only God who exists by nature. Every other creature derives existence from God who chose to create the world and all that exists. The world exists because of God’s free choice that the world should be (Genesis 1: 1-25). In Adam, the human race is chosen and sent on a mission to change in the context of service to “be fruitful, multiply, fill the earth and conquer it. Humanity was chosen to be master of the fish of the sea, the birds of heaven and all living creatures on the earth” (Genesis 1: 28- 29). Jesus Christ would tell us later that, “Any tree that does not produce good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire” (Matthew 7: 19). But in Adam, humanity failed in the call to be fruitful. The eating of the forbidden fruit (Genesis 3) is akin to producing sour fruits (Isaiah 5: 1-4).

Today we live in a world where some people present themselves simply as the best and agents of change. Some people have developed a complex of not seeing anything good in the present, they only think that, “the bird in the bush is better than the bird at hand”, contrary to the normal adage that, “a bird at hand is worth more than a thousand in the bush”. Because the human person is selfish, the world has been turned to a rolling stone that gathers no mud. To encourage self transformation, the Church celebrates Ash Wednesday to recall humanity to authentic existence. The wearing of ashes is a response to the call to repent and believe in the Gospel (Mark 1:15). Those who wear ashes are reminded that from dust, they were created and to dust they would return (Genesis 3:19).

PRESIDENT, PASTOR AND GOVERNANCE




 PRESIDENT, PASTOR AND GOVERNANCE
Cornelius Afebu Omonokhua

I have wondered and pondered why the new President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria had pastors as running mates in the two past presidential elections. One could think that it was either because he loves pastors or because it was the option of his political parties. In 2011, Muhammadu Buhari had Pastor Tunde Bakare as running mate under the Congress for Progressive Change (CPC). One would have expected that our new President would drop the idea of “a pastor running mate” when on February 2, 2014, NigerianEye and some other media reported that Tunde Bakare during a sermon allegedly likens APC to the Church of Satan. This did not happen. In 2015, Buhari again had another pastor, Prof Yemi Osibanjo as running mate in the All Progressive Congress (APC). This time, they won the election and took over governance on May 29, 2015.  While I congratulate the new President of Nigeria to the governance and leadership of the nation, may I welcome him with a silent hidden puzzle: “Mr President Sir, why do you love to work with a Pastor as your vice whereas you are a committed and dedicated Muslim?”