Monday 30 June 2014

WEAVING PEACE IN A RIFT VALLEY




WEAVING PEACE IN A RIFT VALLEY

Cornelius Afebu Omonokhua
                                               
Introduction

In May 2010, I attended a workshop on peace building at the Aberdare Country Club, Nyeri – Kenya. This training was facilitated by Catholic Relief Services (CRS) for the Anglophone West African. Archbishop Peter Kairo, the Catholic Archdiocese of Nyeri in his opening speech emphasized the pain of crisis. For him, “the victims most affected by the absence of peace are families” who are torn apart in Africa as a result of war, terrorism that result in displacement of people into refugee camps. In moment of crisis, victims of war and violence use to take refuge in places of worship. In Nigeria today, some people are even afraid to attend their normal regular hours of worship for fear of bomb explosions.  This is a big threat to the future of African values of hospitality and community that Africa is known for.  The training in Nyeri, Kenya ended with a wonderful phrase: “weaving peace in a rift valley”. This means that every normal person should be interested in “peace building project” to save our religions and our nations.

REAPING THE WHIRLWIND




REAPING THE WHIRLWIND

Cornelius Afebu Omonokhua

The community of Zamza felt really offended by Azala community. There were many options and opportunities opened to resolve their conflict. The first option was to identify the real problem and then invite the leaders of both communities to a sincere dialogue. The second option was to go to war. The leaders of both communities were not willing to sacrifice their children in any kind of war. Azala king and elders decided that dialogue would be the best option and did not see the need to prepare for physical battle. Zamza had a lot of slaves and foreigner

WHAT HAPPENED TO AFRICAN HOSPITALITY?




WHAT HAPPENED TO AFRICAN HOSPITALITY?

Cornelius Afebu Omonokhua


I feel nostalgic for the African village setting. The things I took for granted as a child make so much meaning to me now. Even with all the technological development and advancement, I have come to realise that our fathers and mothers were heroes in the past. I am grateful to God for enabling me witness the time when visitors were accommodated in our homes without having to pay rent. I witnessed the time when land was never a commercial commodity in our villages. Land was joyfully given to those who have enough resources to build houses. Land was leased unconditionally to those who have the energy to farm.  Marriage was not dictated by religion; otherwise I would not have seen the light of day if my maternal grand father who was a Muslim did not allow my mother to marry my father who was not a Muslim.

WHERE IS AFRICAN ROYAL REVERENCE?




WHERE IS AFRICAN ROYAL REVERENCE?

Cornelius Afebu Omonokhua

As a child in the Primary School, many years ago, it was my wish to have a glimpse of the Ogieneni of Uzairue (our traditional ruler). In those days, it was difficult to see traditional rulers. To see them was like seeing the ancestors. The traditional rulers were treated like deities such that in Etsako, Edo State of Nigeria, there was a saying that “Ogie na gbelamhi ga, oyi’sera (the king who the hunters venerate with animals does not go into the bush hunting). It is obvious that this reverence is disappearing into an abysmal void and oblivion.  The kings were so revered because it was the faith of the traditional African that “kings are made from heaven by the transcendent God”. Is there any explanation as to what has happened to our traditional institutions? I would like to know where the young ones now have found the audacity to attack a traditional ruler.

Oma Djebah, Collins Edomaruse, Lanre Issa-Onilu, Agaju Madugba and Oke Epia  in an article “Royal Fathers: Their Power, Influence, Relevance...” published in  August 31, 2003 and retrieved by BNW News  3 September 2010 affirms that “Nigerian traditional rulers often derive their titles from the rulers of independent states or communities that existed before the formation of modern Nigeria. Although they do not have formal political power, in many cases they continue to command respect from their people and have considerable influence”.

Before the advent of democracy, the traditional institutions were points of reference in the sustenance and maintenance of peace in their communities. Even after independence, cases of quarrels; theft, and all sorts of crimes which were traditionally referred to as “abomination” were referred to the Community head (chief) and the council of elders. Very serious matters were referred to the king (the royal father). It was an abomination to bring into the community the police to arrest an accused person without any reference to the Chief. Even when a case is reported to the police, no police enters the community to arrest an accused without first reporting to the traditional rulers. Unfortunately, traditional rulers today can be arrested by the subjects. This defies the royal reverence that was the norm in our early days which, I would refer to as civilized time.

When we were studying Nigeria history in the secondary school, I still remember that we were thought that the Edo, Hausa, Fulani, Yoruba, Nupe, Boni, Igala etc where highly monarchical and the words of the traditional rulers simply meant “command”. The Igbos’ “umunna” was sacred and was capable of maintaining peace and harmony in the community. Before the late 19th century, Oyo, Kanem-Bornu, Sokoto, Benin etc had no political structures like we have today but each empire had a recognized structure and a Head / ruler. For instance, Sokoto caliphate had emirates who may be independent but with due allegiance to the Sultan of Sokoto. From records, the emirates had traditional norms and regulations that kept the people together in peace and harmony. Perhaps we may still identify these traditional norms before the advent of Christianity and Islam in the various parts of Africa. These norms ought to have made the Christian and Islamic commandments more relevant to our people.

I do not believe that a well cultured African would insult his or her elders talk less of making an attempt to kill an Emir, or an Oba. What has modern civilization with its Christian and Islamic outfit done to our African Royal reverence? Can we just think a little and have a bit of retrospection into the African culture and traditions before Christianity and Islam in terms of our values and respect? Some people have cautioned that some traditional rulers have betrayed the royal crown by selling chieftaincy titles to those who do not deserve the honours from the traditional institutions. Some alleged that some traditional rulers have modernized the royal decorum to such an extent that the difference between them and the subjects are hardly noticed especially when they bow to the rich for their daily bread.

This betrayal of the royal throne could be traced back to the colonial era when the Europeans traded with our ancestral royal fathers who exchanged for cotton, guns and whisky, their subjects’ children as slaves in Calabar, Bonny and Lagos. The Niger Coast Protectorate of 1891 and the 1879–1900 the Royal Niger Company and the eventual sale of some part of Africa to the British government in 1900 with the emergence of the Southern Nigeria Protectorate and the Northern Nigeria Protectorate that were merged in 1914 into the Colony and Protectorate of Nigeria is also a root to our problems. While it may seem to be childish to keep hanging on this reminiscence without examining how Africans have enabled this situation to a selfish advantage instead of holding on the dreams of those who fought for our freedom. It is however not easy, for if what the Europeans had brought were good values, the values should blend with ours because “good plus good” would remain good. We need not forget European history that they called themselves barbarians as they fought with each other before they came to Africa. It is sad that we cannot really extricate ourselves from our indoctrination by tracing our traditional roots that has been eroded by colonialism and religion. 
The 1999 Constitution even with the amendments in 2010 was silent about the specific roles of the traditional rulers.  This discussion of the place of traditional rulers in the mainstream of partisan politics has been attended with positive and negative reactions. Those in support have based their arguments on the fact that the traditional rulers are close to the grass-roots in such a way that they can assist the government in ensuring peace, security and social progress. Those against argue that the global societies play a different tune from the original concept of traditional leadership. The atomic age operates on the philosophy of “everyone for himself and God for us all”. 
It appears that the present administration of the Federal Republic of Nigeria is conscious of the role and dignity of the royal institution. Before the 2011 elections the president of the Federal Republic of Nigeria revealed in an interaction with Benue State traditional rulers, at the palace of the Tor Tiv in Gboko that “a constitutional framework had been established to ensure that traditional rulers across the country were given definite roles to play in the affairs of the country”. Some people have suggested the creation of “a Council of Traditional Rulers at the federal level and the reintroduction of the House of Chiefs which existed in the First Republic at the state level. These discussions suggest that the constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria need a contextual approach that will guarantee the safety of the royal fathers and their royal reverence. It may not be unconstitutional for the laws of the nation to protect the African Traditional Institutions in a secular state. This proactive measure may be more potent than accusing the JTF of not being able to protect the Royal Fathers. Long live our Kings!




Fr. Prof. Cornelius Afebu Omonokhua is the Director of Mission and Dialogue of the Catholic Secretariat of Nigeria, Abuja; and Consultor of the Commission for Religious Relations with Muslims (C.R.R.M), Vatican City (comonokhua@hotmail.com).
 

BEYOND ISLAM IN NIGERIA





BEYOND ISLAM IN NIGERIA

Cornelius Afebu Omonokhua

Almost all the newspapers of Thursday September 26, 2013 reported that the insecurity in Nigeria is an effort to overthrow democracy in favour of theocracy, a government where God would be the president of Nigeria.

It should be noted that even in a theocratic government, God uses human beings as instrument to execute the divine laws.  For instance, in Africa, Islam, through human agents has had some positive influence in the religious, economic and political life of many Countries. They are: Algeria, Angola, Benin Republic, Botswana, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cameroon, Cape Verde, Central African Republic, Chad, Comoros, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Republic of the Congo, Ivory Coast, Djibouti, Egypt, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Gabon, The Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Kenya, Lesotho, Liberia, Libya, Malawi, Mali, Mauritania, Mauritius, Morocco, Mozambique, Namibia, Niger, Nigeria, Rwanda, São Tomé and Príncipe, Senegal, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Africa, South Sudan, Sudan, Swaziland, Tanzania, Togo, Tunisia, Uganda, Western Sahara, Zambia and Zimbabwe.

Looking at the life of Saudi Arabia where the call to Islam originated from, one is tempted to look beyond Islam in the enquiry of the root causes of the violence in some parts of Africa. Islam being a total way of life ought to enrich all aspects of life in Africa.  The use of Arabic numerals can be traced to Islam. That a person can recite the whole Qur’an means that a true Muslim has the intellectual potential to contribute positively to the technology and civilization of any nation. Saudi Government is able to honestly manage the oil wealth of their country because of their religious conviction and intellectual disposition. This is to say that Islam is not synonymous to ignorance as some adherents tend to portray. It is obvious today that we are reaping the fruits of ignorance and not what some people call “radical Islam”.  It is difficult to manipulate an enlightened person even in abject material poverty.

In Edo State of Nigeria, Auchi that has a very high population of Muslims in Edo North is one of the most peaceful communities in Nigeria. Life in Auchi is not defined by religion. Muslims, Christians and adherents of traditional religion live together in peace and harmony. This has encouraged dialogue of life and social engagements. The traditional ruler of Auchi is known for his conviction that he is not the Otaru of Auchi Muslims only but the Otaru of everybody irrespective of religion. The royal family of Auchi has the highest number of graduates in Auchi kingdom.   

In most of our meetings with Christians and Muslims in Interreligious relations; some people often look out for the Muslims from the Northern part of Nigeria. A lot of people believe that Islam in the North is different from anywhere else in Nigeria. Some people have taken the insecurity in the North to mean that all the Muslims in the North are violent. On the contrary I have personal experiences that make me think otherwise. In 1991, I went to New Benin market in Edo State Nigeria to change some dollars into naira. Three months after, I went to the same “malam” from the far North of Nigeria for the same business. Immediately the man saw me he said, “I have been praying to Allah that I would see you again. The last time you came to change money; I discovered that I did not give you the whole money in naira. ‘Walahi!’ Islam teaches me that I should not cheat anybody”. I was amazed at the man’s honesty when he handed me a sealed envelope containing the balanced money which he kept hoping that one day, he would see me. Other examples of wonderful honest and loving Muslims from the Northern part of Nigeria are numerous. When we were young we find it safer to trade with the Northern Muslims because of their honesty and sincerity. This is why I think that we should look beyond Islam in finding solution to the insecurity that is presently ravaging Nigeria and other parts of the world. It is alleged that Christians find it difficult to acquire land to build Churches in the Muslim dominated areas of Northern Nigeria. Is this the teaching of Islam or the manipulation of Political leaders?

The history of Islam in Nigeria appears to reveal that some people and group of people have deviated from the true teaching of the prophet of Islam (SAW).  In Nigeria, it is possible to identify the Sunni, Shia and Ahmadiyya Islam that originated from India in the 19th century as a reformatory sect. In Christianity, the community of Jesus Christ existed as a single Church for almost sixteen centuries. It was easy to identify the Church as One, Holy, Apostolic and Universal. The message and interpretation of Islam was one and universal during the time of Prophet Muhammad (SAW). The efforts of human beings to proliferate the message of the prophets by forming sects and denominations have not promoted the unity of believers in the history of religion.

The era of 1970-1980 witnessed the rise of Mohammed Marwa Maitatsine, who started a religious revolution in Kano. Maitatsine claimed to have had divine revelations to purify Islam by attacking traditional mosques and congregations. The work of Abiodun Alao on “Islamic Radicalisation and Violence in Nigeria, retrieved March 1, 2013” reveals that Muhammadu Marwa, the leader of the   Maitatsine group was killed in 1980, he was succeeded by Musa Makaniki who was also executed in 2006. Another leader of Yan Tatsine, Malam Badamasi, was killed in 2009. At the dusk of Maitasine revolution, it was clear that their agenda was far from true Islam.

In the Encyclopædia Britannica, Chicago, 2007, the essay on Othman Dan Fodio   affirms that “in the early 19th century, Islamic scholar Usman dan Fodio launched a jihad against the Hausa Kingdoms of Northern Nigeria. He was victorious, and established the Fulani Empire with its capital at Sokoto”. One would have expected Sokoto to be the citadel of terrorism if our current security situation is a purely Islamic agenda. It is worthy of note that we do not hear of terrorist activities in Sokoto even when Alhaji Shehu Shagari, was unjustly overthrown in a coup by a fellow Muslim.  Therefore, we need to go beyond the claim that the terrorist want to overthrow democracy for Islam. Beyond Islam, let us examine other possible causes like politics, ethnic bigotry, material poverty and outright manipulation of others.  Is it not possible that the same people who are financing this terrorist agenda are those who have lost relevance in the democratic process? Let us search deeper and not be distracted with this game that is dressed in a religious garment. 

Fr. Prof. Cornelius Afebu Omonokhua is the Director of Mission and Dialogue of the Catholic Secretariat of Nigeria, Abuja and Consultor of the Commission for Religious Relations with Muslims (C.R.R.M), Vatican City (comonokhua@hotmail.com)

HELMET AND SHIELD FOR OUR KINGS




HELMET AND SHIELD FOR OUR KINGS

Cornelius Afebu Omonokhua

The report, “Unsung Heroes of Kano Emirate” on January 27, 2013 in the Sunday Trust reminds me of what Fr. Benjamin Dara CSSP told me in 1985 that “if you take care of your parishioners, your parishioners will take care of you.” The report revealed that “the palace guards of the Emir of Kano are resilient, loyal, trustworthy and lovely”. Two of the guards laid down their lives, shielding the monarch from a barrage of bullets that rained on the 83-year-old monarch’s car. Their heroic act has become a subject of eulogy among residents of Kano city. My discussion with the Catholic Bishop of Kano, Most Rev. Dr John Niyiring OSA reveals that the Emir of Kano truly loves his people and leads them with his wealth of experience. The Emir was attacked while coming from a religious duty to encourage the young students. If a leader loves his or her people and provides for them, the people in turn will do everything to give him or her protection.

The recommendation of a constitutional protection for the royal fathers in my publication “where is Africa’s royal reverence” on Sunday January 27, 2013 in Sunday Trust and Pilot newspapers, have attracted some reactions. The first is that the helmet and shield the royal fathers need go beyond constitutional protection. Another person asked if the kings will not be robbed of their royal relevance if they are actively involved in politics and given political roles in governance. My recommendation however was the need to actively involve the royal fathers in identifying and fishing out suspected criminals in their various domains. This is by making them aware of cases within their area before a suspect reaches the police net, through the traditional intelligence report. This will charge them with the responsibility and accountability of their office of taking care of the people. This however should not be seen as a political appointment and a substitute for the duty of the Police.

It is a fact that “man knows man” in every community. In my village for example, some people know the people that are peaceful and the people that are troublesome. It follows that a traditional ruler is in a position to know those who upset the shared existence in their land. This is where the traditional rulers become very relevant. They can use their traditional means like age groups and the masquerades to fish out those who are thorns in the flesh of the communities. There is a saying in Africa that “a child who says that the parents must not sleep also denies himself of sleep.” Every Royal King should be skilled in security details through conflict prevention, conflict management and conflict transformation, first as their helmet and shield, second as their means to transform their communities into a celestial bliss. 

From the dialogue with the people in “the public parliaments” and “traditional amphitheatre” it has been revealed that the first protection of the king lies in his own personal helmet, shield and breast plate. This means that the king must protect his personal integrity by giving traditional relevance to the royal crown and the staff of the royal office. If these symbols are carelessly desecrated, the king would not be protected even by the ancestors.

History has revealed that in some parts of the globe, some kings have died in the process of robbing their own subjects. Some have been accused of enabling kidnappers while some have been found to be directly involved in the acts. Some have also been accused of ritual killings and corruption to make money. These are some of the ways some kings have sold their royal crown, helmet, shield and their breast plate. The crown is the symbol of authority, the shield protects the king from poisonous arrows and the breast plates prevent the sword from piecing the heart of the king. These symbols mean that the king needs the head and the heart to lead his subjects.

The strength of a leader is found in his intelligence (wisdom), courage, patience and prudence. A King worthy of defence whose subjects can lay down their lives for is a king who has won victory over his own temperaments. The rage of a king and any leader must not be seen to be cheap. Spontaneous rage and easy burst of thunderous anger are serious indicators that the king or leader has lost his inner peace and security. This is also an indicator that the content of the character of the leader needs reformation in the handling of the affairs of his people. Braveness is deeper than external manifestation of anger because “what the cock uses to catch the hen is hidden.” The king ought to be a man of few words and resilient in action. Our people say that “the bird that knows the worth of its feathers does not fly low.” Again, a loud noise reveals the emptiness of a heavy drum.

The global atomic age has shown that people are no longer respected just because of their positions and titles. In the past, a priest was respected just by seeing him in his cassock or in a clerical collar. A king was respected just because he wore a royal crown and sceptre. This age of enlightenment has shown that people now have to earn their individual respect. It may therefore be deluding for any body to use the symbol of his authority or title as a guarantee to force respect out of people. It is rather easier to earn respect with love, discipline, dedication, responsibility and commitment to one’s office and position. A person makes mockery of his or her position by saying “I will show you my authority or don’t you know who I am and what I can do to you with my authority?”  The perfume and aroma of authority spread freely and naturally from a golden heart that reveals the noble content of character. Very often the power you have over a person ends when he or she leaves your jurisdiction and you may guess the implication of that action.

Alexander III who was the ancient Greek king of Macedon around 323 BC was known as Alexander the Great not because of the power he wielded over his subjects. He was not protected by his helmet of bronze but by the fact that he was buried in the heart of his people who held him in zenith esteem. This explains why he was able to raise an army that made him the most successful military commander in history. He was never defeated in battle. His “Linen Cuirass” was traditional Greek body armour that was made of stiffened layers of linen with steel scales around his waist as a symbol of chastity. His respect for women kept him undefiled and fortified against any form of distraction through lust. He was disciplined and focussed to gain the respect and obedience of his subjects. His traditional “Gorgon head symbol” shows his wisdom and the content of his royal character. [1] This similar attitude is expected of the African king to win the favour of the ancestors, the protection of Almighty God, and the support of the subjects who will be eager to listen (obedience) whenever the royal majesty gives a command.  


Fr. Prof. Cornelius Afebu Omonokhua is the Director of Mission and Dialogue of the Catholic Secretariat of Nigeria, Abuja; and Consultor of the Commission for Religious Relations with Muslims (C.R.R.M), Vatican City (comonokhua@hotmail.com).
 




[1]  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_the_Great