MAN: A MYSTERY
TO HIMSELF
Stella Bassey
Esirah
Scientific
study of man can neither discover the truth of man nor unravel the mystery of
man; this is why one would say that there is a mistake in the mechanistic,
scientific description of life.
Determinism is mechanistic and mechanism is scientific because it is
based on observation of how the body operates, biologically the brain becomes
for the scientists the engine of the body. So they explain man as a control
body acting according to impulse and stimuli. Even where this is a true
observation of the makeup of the human body, it is not the knowledge of the
human person. In fact science can only know the body of man which is observable
but can never know that which is not observable in man. Hence there can be a
scientific knowledge of the human body but no scientific knowledge of man. The
concept of man as we use it here is not in the sense of specie but in the sense
of a being that acts through the body. That being is not the body yet that
being acts through the body this is why we can say that the human person is not
the body alone for example, one can see a child growing but cannot see the
actual growth per se.
Nonetheless,
the truth of man is only partially accessible to philosophy because of its
speculative nature. There is a principle in man which is distinct from the
body. St. Thomas Aquinas discussed this principle by saying that a soul is the
life principle of a living body and it is that substance which makes the living
body the specific kind of living body it is. Aquinas went further to explain
this principle which is not obvious of science but philosophical, he says “The
human soul is a non-bodily substance endowed with intellect and will. The human
soul has an extrinsic dependence on the body. It can exist and operate per se
even if it is severed from the body.” (S.A. Ia2 Q75, p.60) This truth of the
soul is not scientific it is philosophical but, philosophy is not enough since
divine revelation is required. We say that science is a body established with
certitude; but to what extent is this notion true; since there are truths which
science has no access to; such as the truth of man, and philosophy also cannot
reach absolute certitude about this. The issue of man still cannot be exhausted
in philosophy or science because man remains a mystery even though; scholars
have made effort to offer an insight into this mystery.
The
soul is the true self and the body is merely the accompaniment of the soul, it
is the inner spirit or self, of a person – superior to the body, in which it
was temporarily confined during life on earth. The truth of man is not found in
science for science only describes the body of man but not the truth of man.
But from speculation and reflections, philosophy is able to stumble on such
truths about man, though its claims are not empirical. This is why in solving
one problem from different contexts of reasoning, whether a posteriori, a
priori, or ontological, there continues to be equal reactions put in the same
context. This makes all the contexts to equally expand ad infinitum or without
limit to the amount of interest raised by the subject concern. This
necessitates reactions because of its nature which is subject to speculation
and multiplicity of thought and diversity of opinions on the same issue.
Opinions or problems are open to many reactions since human thoughts are
somehow connected. Hence, in human reasoning there is extension based on this
connectivity of points raised as philosophical problems; which could be
responded to form different contexts. The problem which aptly describes the
nature of philosophy is the problem of man. There has never been unanimous
understanding of what man is. This; we can affirm to be the fundamental
question of man (The human person) It was the above question which inform
Parmenides’ denial of change. That is, it was the problem from infinity to
finitude, which made Parmenides reflect on being abstracted from the
philosophical problem of man as a human being. In his reflection on being,
Parmenides had to deny that change was possible; for nothing comes into being
as nothing goes out of being therefore; only being can produce another of its
kind. From the above, the fact remains, man is a mystery to himself and to
others.
Man
is the only being that has within him, a rational principle of organization,
hence the only being that is organized. Thus he has a self-propagating
formative power, which cannot be explained through the capacity of movement
alone. This organization in man can be
found in all his make ups, body senses, body system, mind system and soul
system. That principle of organization is itself internal to man. People hold
different opinions regarding what the human person is made up of. But we hold
that man is a rational being which gives him/her the capacity to plan, and by
planning to order himself/herself, he/she sets his goals which he strives to
achieve.
This
is what makes man autonomous and no other specie but the human species with
ability for self rule. By this, man becomes the lord of nature, since every
other thing in nature including nature itself lacks autonomy. Having an order
does not mean ruling oneself so, nature lacks autonomy though it is
teleological, man’s place in nature is therefore to serve for a lord in nature
that interprets, relates, apply and maintains the order of nature, so that the
principle of order in nature will make meaning. Nature itself is readily
discovered by man and he intuitively knows what to do to maintain it but man is
not able to discover and maintain the order of his own being.
His
own teleology is called destiny, moving on the path of human destiny is only
possible insofar as man in his autonomy can apply his principle of organization
and go on to direct his being through actions that flourish his being. He
follows his plan, to achieve his goals, to realize his purpose and to depict in
himself a certain degree of authenticity of self discovery. Self discovery is
the truth of man that lies within man; this truth within man does not lie in
man’s appearance or physical nature as it is in nature that has no interiority
since everything in nature is an appearance; such that nature could be said to
conceive of only appearances. Whatever science and Philosophy is trying to
discover about man, it is not sufficient in knowing the mystery of the human
person for; this knowledge belongs to the ultimate being, the creator and cause
of human existence and this being is God.
Sr.
Dr. Stella Bassey Esirah HHCJ is a lecturer and Head of Department of Philosophy
at St. Joseph Catholic Major Seminary, Ikot Ekpene, Akwa Ibom State